¿Está la virtud en el punto medio? La incertidumbre del CIN2 y el papel del VPH / Is virtue at the midpoint? The uncertainty of CIN2 and the role of HPV

Objetivo: La biopsia guiada por colposcopia (BGC) marca el manejo de la neoplasia intraepitelial cervical. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la concordancia de los resultados entre la BGC y la escisión amplia de la zona de transformación (LLETZ, large loop excision of the transformation zone), y la utilidad del genotipado del virus del papiloma humano (VPH) para seleccionar a las pacientes con riesgo de lesión intraepitelial escamosa de alto grado/neoplasia intraepitelial cervical 3 (HSIL/CIN3). Método: Se compararon los resultados de la BGC y de la LLETZ, siendo esta última el método de referencia. Se evaluó la relación del genotipo del VPH con el diagnóstico final de HSIL/CIN3. Resultados: La precisión de la biopsia comparada con LLETZ fue del 61,4%. La tasa de concordancia fue del 64,4% para CIN1, del 31,4% para CIN2 y del 77,4% para CIN3. La tasa global de sobrediagnóstico fue del 18,68% y la de subdiagnóstico del 19,89%. En mujeres menores de 30 años, la concordancia fue del 62,79% (CIN1 65%, CIN2 39,58% y CIN3 73,08%), la tasa de sobrediagnóstico del 22,67% y la tasa de subdiagnóstico del 15,11%. La infección por VPH16 tuvo una odds ratio de 3,86 para el diagnóstico final de HSIL/CIN3+. Conclusiones: El diagnóstico de CIN2 por BGC parece insuficiente para seleccionar a las pacientes para tratamiento escisional, principalmente en mujeres jóvenes. El hallazgo de VPH16 es un factor de riesgo de HSIL/CIN3+ independientemente del resultado de la biopsia.

Objective: Colposcopy-guided biopsy (CGB) is a basic tool for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the concordance of results between CGB and large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), and the usefulness of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping to select patients at risk of H-SIL/CIN3. Method: The results of colposcopy-guided biopsy and LLETZ were compared, with LLETZ being the gold standard. The relationship of HPV genotype to the final diagnosis of CIN3 was assessed. Results: The accuracy of CGB compared to LLETZ was 61.4%. The concordance rate was 64.4% for CIN1, 31.4% for CIN2 and 77.4% for CIN3. The overall overdiagnosis rate was 18.68% and underdiagnosis rate was 19.89%. In women under 30 years of age the concordance rate was 62.79% (CIN1 65%, CIN2 39.58% and CIN3 73.08%), and the rate of overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis was 22.67% and 15.11%, respectively. HPV16 infection had an odds ratio of 3.86 for the final diagnosis of CIN3+ and the result was significant regardless of the biopsy result. Conclusions: The CGB result as CIN2 is inaccurate and seems insufficient to select patients for excisional treatment, mainly in young women. HPV16 infection is a risk factor for CIN3+ regardless of the colposcopy-guided biopsy result.

Supresión de la visita de tercer trimestre en embarazo de bajo riesgo en la pandemia de SARS-CoV-2 / Third trimester suppression in low-risk pregnancy in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Resumen Objetivo: La pandemia de SARS-CoV-2 ha obligado a una reorganización de las visitas presenciales, y por ese motivo se han minimizado hasta el punto de reconsiderar la realización de la visita del tercer trimestre. Nuestro centro suprimió dicha visita obstétrica y obtuvo datos propios para comparar los resultados perinatales logrados con dicho manejo. Método: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo, en marzo de 2020, con una cohorte con visita presencial única en la semana 40 de gestación (122 gestantes) frente a una cohorte con seguimiento convencional con visita presencial en la semana 36 de gestación (162 gestantes). Se evaluaron la restricción del crecimiento fetal, la edad gestacional al nacimiento, el peso neonatal y las tasas de inducciones, partos eutócicos y cesáreas urgentes en trabajo de parto. Resultados: Se encontraron diferencias leves en la tasa de nuliparidad (p < 0,04), sin hallarlas en el resto de las variables maternas. No hubo diferencias entre las dos cohortes en los resultados neonatales. Conclusiones: No hay diferencias entre los resultados materno-fetales obtenidos en gestantes con seguimiento gestacional con restricción de la visita del tercer trimestre respecto del seguimiento tradicional, excepto en el diagnóstico de las alteraciones de la estática fetal al término de la gestación.

Abstract Objective: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has forced a reorganization of face-to-face visits, for this reason they have been minimized to the point of reconsidering the completion of the third trimester visit. Our center eliminated the performance of this obstetric visit and obtained its own data to compare the perinatal results obtained with such management. Method: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in March 2020, with a cohort with a single face-to-face visit at 40th week of gestation (122 pregnant women), versus a cohort with conventional follow-up with face-to-face visit at 36th week of gestation (162 pregnant women). The following were evaluated fetal growth restriction, gestational age at birth, neonatal weight, rate of inductions, of eutocic deliveries, and of urgent cesarean sections in labor. Results: Slight differences were found in the nulliparity rate (p < 0.04), without finding them in the rest of the maternal variables. There were no differences between the two cohorts in neonatal outcomes. Conclusions: There were no differences between the maternal-fetal results obtained in pregnant women with gestational follow-up with restriction of the third trimester visit compared to traditional follow-up, except in the diagnosis of alterations in fetal statics at the end of pregnancy.

Open-legs axial plane: A standardized methodology and reference values for fetal genital biometry in mid-trimester ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the external genitalia is an important part of prenatal ultrasound. However, there is no standardized methodology that includes biometric measurements and normative data to be able to carry out this evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To develop a standardized methodology for fetal genital biometry and obtain reference values for use in mid-trimester ultrasound. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional study was used. 273 male and 253 female fetuses of normal, singleton pregnancies at 18 to 22 weeks were included. Measurements of fetal penis length, penile width and transverse scrotal diameter in male fetuses and bilabial diameter in female fetuses were performed by transabdominal ultrasound. Reference values were calculated for each gestational week. RESULTS: Realization of the open-legs axial plane is described as a working methodology. Normative data for penile length, penile width, transverse scrotal diameter and bilabial diameter are defined, including mean, minimum and maximum values, range, and 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th percentiles. CONCLUSIONS: We have provided a standardized methodology using the open-legs axial plane, which would integrate the main measurements. In addition with the normative data constructed from their use, we hope to be able to improve the external genitalia assessment and diagnosis of genital anomalies in mid-trimester ultrasound.

Does the trend toward less deep excisions in LLETZ to minimize obstetric risk lead to less favorable oncological outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) depth and the persistence of disease and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational retrospective study included women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 who underwent LLETZ at Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain, from November 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016. Follow-up of cytology and HPV detection were performed at 6 and 12-18 months after surgery. RESULTS: In this study of 256 women, multivariate analysis revealed that conization depth of 10 mm or less did not indicate an increase of persistence/recurrence of pathological cytology at 6 months (P=0.094) and after 12-18 months (P=0.234), or infection by HPV at 6 months (P=0.675) and 12-18 months (P=0.938) after LLETZ. The affected endocervical margin at 6 months is the sole independent risk factor for persistence, both in the lesion (P=0.003) and HPV (P=0.004). CONCLUSION: Conization depth lower than 10 mm at LLETZ did not increase disease persistence or infection by HPV in an 18 month monitoring period. Therefore, higher depth conizations would not be justified to ensure favorable oncological results.